Filing
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32157
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 84-1318182 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
6725 Mesa Ridge Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA | 92121 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(858) 552-0866
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | ||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, $0.001 par value, as of August
4, 2009 was 117,792,960.
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,419,227 | $ | 9,849,904 | ||||
Interest and other receivables |
31,407 | 121,736 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
573,423 | 477,902 | ||||||
Total current assets |
6,024,057 | 10,449,542 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
74,919 | 199,052 | ||||||
Other assets |
67,654 | 60,664 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,166,630 | $ | 10,709,258 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
252,226 | 1,721,376 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
3,319,202 | 2,077,188 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and payroll taxes |
299,383 | 915,459 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,870,811 | 4,714,023 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 1,993 shares authorized;
1,993 shares issued and 0 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and 0 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
| | ||||||
5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 1,361 shares authorized; 0
shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 108,288,771 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 90,252,572 as of December 31, 2008 |
108,290 | 90,254 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
135,018,954 | 131,751,439 | ||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(132,831,425 | ) | (125,846,458 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,295,819 | 5,995,235 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,166,630 | $ | 10,709,258 | ||||
Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from audited financial
statements at that date. It does not include, however, all of the information and notes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial
statements.
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Inception | ||||||||||||||||||||
(June 12, 1996) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | through June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 174,830 | ||||||||||
Grant revenue |
| | | | 129,733 | |||||||||||||||
Licensing revenue |
| 500,000 | 300,000 | 500,000 | 1,300,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
| 500,000 | 300,000 | 500,000 | 1,604,563 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| | | | 51,094 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
| 500,000 | 300,000 | 500,000 | 1,553,469 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,454,896 | 4,511,395 | 3,102,197 | 8,331,702 | 65,116,752 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
1,071,754 | 2,635,688 | 2,850,994 | 5,000,882 | 45,820,196 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25,835 | 44,116 | 58,081 | 90,895 | 10,856,152 | |||||||||||||||
In-process research and development |
| | | | 10,422,130 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss write off of goodwill |
| | | | 5,702,130 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in loss of investee |
| | | | 178,936 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
2,552,485 | 7,191,199 | 6,011,272 | 13,423,479 | 138,096,296 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(2,552,485 | ) | (6,691,199 | ) | (5,711,272 | ) | (12,923,479 | ) | (136,542,827 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on fair value of warrants |
| | | | (12,239,688 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest & other income (expense) |
(43,056 | ) | 265,669 | (41,280 | ) | 564,877 | 4,359,882 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | 114,154 | |||||||||||||||
Loss before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
(2,595,541 | ) | (6,425,530 | ) | (5,752,552 | ) | (12,358,602 | ) | (144,308,479 | ) | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
| | | | (25,821 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(2,595,541 | ) | (6,425,530 | ) | (5,752,552 | ) | (12,358,602 | ) | (144,334,300 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | (621,240 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend on preferred stock |
(1,232,415 | ) | | (1,232,415 | ) | | (1,232,415 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss applicable to common stock |
$ | (3,827,956 | ) | $ | (6,425,530 | ) | $ | (6,984,967 | ) | $ | (12,358,602 | ) | $ | (146,187,955 | ) | |||||
Net loss per common share basic and
Diluted |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average shares basic and
Diluted |
93,389,302 | 90,252,572 | 91,838,172 | 90,252,572 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Inception | ||||||||||||
(June 12, 1996) | ||||||||||||
through | ||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,752,552 | ) | $ | (12,358,602 | ) | $ | (144,334,300 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
58,081 | 90,895 | 10,406,152 | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
52,003 | 48,404 | ||||||||||
Fair value of warrant liability |
| | 12,239,688 | |||||||||
Expenses related to employee stock options |
305,179 | 994,258 | 8,157,741 | |||||||||
Expenses related to stock options issued to non-employees |
| 5,513 | 204,664 | |||||||||
Expenses paid by issuance of common stock |
| | 1,341,372 | |||||||||
Expenses paid by warrants |
| | 573,357 | |||||||||
Expenses paid by preferred stock |
| | 142,501 | |||||||||
Expenses related to stock warrants issued |
| | 612,000 | |||||||||
Accretion of discount |
| (196,633 | ) | (1,249,853 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
| | 450,000 | |||||||||
Accretion of discount on investments in securities |
| | (354,641 | ) | ||||||||
Forgiveness of employee receivable |
| | 30,036 | |||||||||
Impairment loss write-off of goodwill |
| | 5,702,130 | |||||||||
Equity in loss of investee |
| | 178,936 | |||||||||
In-process research and development |
| | 10,422,130 | |||||||||
Write-off of license agreement |
| | 152,866 | |||||||||
Write-off of assets available-for-sale |
| | 108,000 | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| | 25,821 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
||||||||||||
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
(12,182 | ) | (48,280 | ) | (919,853 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(843,212 | ) | (16,228 | ) | 4,047,519 | |||||||
Decrease in other long-term liabilities |
| (10,703 | ) | | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(6,192,683 | ) | (11,539,780 | ) | (92,015,330 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
| (13,362,230 | ) | (111,183,884 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments |
| 22,800,000 | 112,788,378 | |||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
| (40,182 | ) | (1,030,354 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
14,049 | | 47,955 | |||||||||
Purchase of certificate of deposit |
| | (1,016,330 | ) | ||||||||
Maturity of certificate of deposit |
| | 1,016,330 | |||||||||
Payment on obligation under license agreement |
| | (106,250 | ) | ||||||||
Cash acquired from acquisitions, net of cash paid |
| | 32,395 | |||||||||
Issuance of note receivable related party |
| | (35,000 | ) |
5
Table of Contents
Inception | ||||||||||||
(June 12, 1996) | ||||||||||||
through | ||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Payments on note receivable |
| | 405,993 | |||||||||
Advance to investee |
| | (90,475 | ) | ||||||||
Cash transferred in rescission of acquisition |
| | (19,475 | ) | ||||||||
Cash received in rescission of acquisition |
| | 230,000 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
14,049 | 9,397,588 | 1,039,283 | |||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock |
1,993,000 | | 6,193,993 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
| | 84,151,342 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
| | 712,367 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale or exercise of warrants |
| | 11,382,894 | |||||||||
Repurchase of warrants |
| | (55,279 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of financing and offering costs |
(245,043 | ) | | (6,728,852 | ) | |||||||
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt |
| | (605,909 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and detachable warrants |
| | 1,344,718 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,747,957 | | 96,395,274 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(4,430,677 | ) | (2,142,192 | ) | 5,419,227 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
9,849,904 | 14,780,739 | | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 5,419,227 | $ | 12,638,547 | $ | 5,419,227 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (ADVENTRX, we or the Company), prepared the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2009 (2008 Annual Report). The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report. In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year. |
Since our inception, we have an accumulated net loss of approximately $144.3 million and recurring negative cash flows from operations. On June 12, 2009, July 6, 2009 and August 10, 2009, we completed, respectively, an approximately $2.0 million registered direct equity financing, an approximately $1.4 million registered direct equity financing and an approximately $0.9 million registered direct equity financing. Following the completion of the June 2009 financing, we re-started the final manufacturing activities related to submitting a New Drug Application (NDA) for ANX-530 to seek approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market ANX-530 in the United States (U.S.). In addition, we continue to evaluate the data from our recently-completed bioequivalence study of ANX-514 and we plan to seek a meeting with the FDA to discuss the results. However, even following these financings, we may seek to raise substantial additional capital prior to undertaking all of the remaining activities necessary to submit an NDA for ANX-530 and may need to raise substantial additional capital to fund our operations, including activities related to commercialization of ANX-530 in the U.S., if an ANX-530 NDA is submitted and approved by the FDA, and activities related to the development and regulatory review process and, ultimately, commercialization of ANX-514. We also continue to evaluate strategic and partnering options. |
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ADVENTRX (Europe) Ltd. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
2. Going Concern
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Going concern contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable length of time. However, as a result of the Companys continued losses and current cash and financing position, such realization of assets or satisfaction of liabilities, without substantial adjustments, is uncertain. Even following the June 2009, the July 2009 and the August 2009 financings, the future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional funding. The Company previously has taken steps designed to provide additional time to obtain financing or consummate a strategic or partnering transaction. As a result, its ability to further curtail expenses to provide further time is limited, and the restructuring and cost-cutting measures it has taken may not provide it with sufficient additional time to obtain financing or consummate a strategic or partnering transaction. |
In December 2008, the Company announced that it was evaluating various strategic options, including the sale or exclusive license of one or more of the Companys product candidate programs, a strategic business merger and other similar transactions, certain of which would result in a change of control of the Company. However, discussions with potential strategic transaction partners have been unsuccessful, protracted or on terms that the Company determined were unacceptable. In March 2009, due to an immediate need to raise additional capital to continue its business, the Company suspended substantially all of its development activities and fundamental business operations to conserve cash while it evaluated strategic options, pursued financing alternatives and considered whether to liquidate its assets, wind-up its operations and distribute any remaining cash to its stockholders. Further, in May 2009, the Company announced that the primary endpoint in its bioequivalence study of ANX-514 was not met, that the resulting uncertainty around the cost and timeline to approval by the FDA of ANX-514 may adversely impact the Companys on-going strategic transaction discussions, and that, in light of its working capital, the Company was evaluating both its strategic and non-strategic options. Accordingly, in May 2009, while continuing to evaluate strategic and capital-raising alternatives, the Company began to evaluate the process of winding-down its operations, including engaging a third-party firm to assist it with its evaluation. In June 2009, the Company completed an approximately $2.0 million registered direct equity financing, following which the Company re-started certain development activities related to ANX-530 and ANX-514. |
7
Table of Contents
There can be no assurances that the Company will continue to pursue its capital-raising or strategic or partnering transaction alternatives or, if it does, that it will be able to raise capital or consummate a strategic or partnering transaction on a timely basis, or at all. The Company likely will not be able to continue as a going concern, unless, as part of a strategic or partnering transaction or otherwise, it raises adequate capital. Given this uncertainty, there is significant doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. |
The accompanying financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 do not include any adjustments related to the recovery and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities, that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue as a going concern. |
3. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
4. Fair Value Measurements
At June 30, 2009, our financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation and payroll taxes. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation and payroll taxes approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. |
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of FAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. As a result, we only partially adopted FAS 157 as it relates to our financial assets and liabilities until we are required to apply this pronouncement to our non-financial assets and liabilities beginning with fiscal year 2009. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. |
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3). FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of FAS No. 157, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under FAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under FAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. FAS 157 describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following: |
| Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||||
| Level 2 | Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | ||||
| Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
8
Table of Contents
The following table represents our fair value hierarchy for our financial assets (which consisted solely of cash equivalents) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009: |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 5,419,227 | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,419,227 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,419,227 | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,419,227 | ||||||||
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect to measure specified financial assets and liabilities in their entirety at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis. If an entity elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in the items fair value must be reported as unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. In adopting FAS 159, we did not elect the fair value option for any of our financial assets or financial liabilities. |
5. Share-Based Payments
Estimated share-based compensation expense related to equity awards granted to employees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows: |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
$ | 89,418 | $ | 216,053 | $ | 288,772 | $ | 548,774 | ||||||||
Research and development expense |
41,803 | 139,788 | 16,426 | 445,484 | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense before taxes |
131,221 | 355,841 | 305,198 | 994,258 | ||||||||||||
Related income tax benefits |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
$ | 131,221 | $ | 355,841 | $ | 305,198 | $ | 994,258 | ||||||||
Net share-based compensation expense per common
share basic and diluted |
$ | 0.001 | $ | 0.001 | $ | 0.003 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
In January 2009, we granted under our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan restricted stock units to seven employees that represented the right to receive in the aggregate 3,700,000 shares of our common stock. These units will vest immediately prior to a strategic transaction (as defined in the documentation evidencing the grant of the units). We will record share-based compensation expense in connection with these restricted stock units, if at all, only if a strategic transaction is consummated. As of June 30, 2009, as a result of employee terminations and resignations, there were outstanding restricted stock units representing the right to receive an aggregate of 3,150,000 shares of our common stock. In July 2009, as a result of an employee resignation and the termination of a consulting relationship with a former employee, restricted stock units representing the right to receive an aggregate of 1,100,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled and, in connection with certain compensation arrangements with our remaining two employees, we terminated restricted stock units representing the right to receive an aggregate of 2,050,000 shares of our common stock. As of July 31, 2009, we did not have outstanding any restricted stock unit awards. |
Since we have a net operating loss carryforward as of June 30, 2009, no excess tax benefits for the tax deductions related to share-based awards were recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. There were no employee stock options exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008. |
At June 30, 2009, total unrecognized estimated compensation cost related to non-vested employee and non-employee director share-based awards granted prior to that date was $1.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we granted 0 and 1,802,500 stock options, respectively, to our employees and non-employee directors with an estimated weighted-average grant-date fair value of $0 and $0.51. |
9
Table of Contents
Estimated share-based compensation expense related to equity awards granted to non-employee consultants was $0 and ($166) for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
6. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, including foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments. Our components of comprehensive loss consist of net loss and unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments in securities. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, comprehensive loss was $2.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, comprehensive loss was $5.8 million and $12.4 million, respectively. |
7. Net Loss Per Common Share
We calculate basic and diluted net loss per common share in accordance with the FAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net loss per common share was calculated by dividing the net loss applicable to common stock for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Options, warrants and restricted stock units are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share when their effect is dilutive. Because of the net loss, all of the options, warrants and restricted stock units were excluded from the calculation. |
We have excluded the following options, warrants and restricted stock units from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive due to the net loss: |
Three & six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Warrants |
19,828,909 | 13,373,549 | ||||||
Options |
2,812,366 | 6,003,231 | ||||||
Restricted Stock
Units |
3,150,000 | | ||||||
25,791,275 | 19,376,780 | |||||||
8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 168), a replacement to FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, superseding all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in SFAS 168 will become non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We expect SFAS 168 will have an impact on our financial statement disclosures in that all future references to authoritative accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with SFAS 168. |
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires new disclosure in financial statements of the date through which reporting entities have evaluated events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires public entities, including the Company, to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. Financial statements are considered issued when they are widely distributed to stockholders and other financial statement users for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with U.S. GAAP. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied on a prospective basis. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
In April 2009, the FASB issued three new FSPs relating to fair value accounting; FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity of the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, FSP FAS 115-2 and FSP FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments and FSP FAS 107-1/APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. These FSPs impact certain aspects of fair value measurements, impairments of securities and related disclosures. The provisions of these FSPs are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these FSPs had no impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
10
Table of Contents
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R) -1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arises from Contingencies. The FSP amends and clarifies FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This FSP is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting beginning on or after December 15, 2008. |
9. Licensing Revenue
In March 2009, we announced that we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, SD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., had entered into a license agreement with respect to our product candidate ANX-514 (docetaxel emulsion) (the License Agreement) with Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (Shin Poong), pursuant to which we granted to Shin Poong an exclusive license, including the right to sublicense, to research, develop, make, have made, use, offer for sale, sell and import licensed products, in each case solely for the treatment of cancer by intravenous administration of formulations of docetaxel as emulsified products and solely in South Korea. Under the terms of the License Agreement, we would receive an upfront licensing fee of $0.3 million, a regulatory milestone payment of either $0.2 million or $0.4 million (depending on whether Shin Poong is required by the Korea Food and Drug Administration to conduct a bioequivalence or clinical study in human subjects prior to receipt of regulatory approval) upon receipt of regulatory approval for marketing a licensed product in South Korea, one-time commercial milestone payments tied to annual net sales of licensed products in an aggregate amount of up to $1.5 million and royalty payments on net sales of licensed products. Shin Poong is responsible for all development and commercial activities related to ANX-514 in South Korea. If Shin Poong is required by the Korea Food and Drug Administration to conduct a bioequivalence or clinical trial in human subjects prior to receipt of regulatory approval and we elect not to supply product to conduct such trial, which supply obligation is subject to limitations, we will pay Shin Poong $0.1 million. |
We received the $0.3 million upfront licensing fee in April 2009. We recognized $0.3 million in licensing revenue in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 because we met the criteria under our revenue recognition policy in that period. We recorded a liability of $0.1 million, less amounts paid for the benefit of Shin Poong, in the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, but not in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, because our obligation to Shin Poong was not probable in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 but became so in the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. |
10. Supplementary Cash Flow Information
Noncash investing and financing transactions not presented on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from inception (June 12, 1996) through June 30, 2009 are as follows: |
Inception | ||||||||||||
(June 12, 1996) | ||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | through | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | | $ | | $ | 179,090 | ||||||
Income taxes paid |
| | | |||||||||
Issuance of warrants, common stock and preferred stock for: |
||||||||||||
Conversion of notes payable and accrued interest |
| | 1,213,988 | |||||||||
Prepaid services to consultants |
| | 1,482,781 | |||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock |
18,036 | | 20,741 | |||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | 24,781,555 | |||||||||
Payment of dividends |
| | 213,000 | |||||||||
Financial advisor services in connection with private
placement |
| | 1,137,456 |
11
Table of Contents
Inception | ||||||||||||
(June 12, 1996) | ||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | through | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock in settlement of a claim |
| | 34,747 | |||||||||
Cancellation of treasury stock |
| | -34,747 | |||||||||
Assumptions of liabilities in acquisitions |
| | 1,235,907 | |||||||||
Acquisition of license agreement for long-term debt |
| | 161,180 | |||||||||
Cashless exercise of warrants |
| | 4,312 | |||||||||
Dividends accrued |
| | 621,040 | |||||||||
Trade asset converted to available-for-sale asset |
| | 108,000 | |||||||||
Dividends extinguished |
| | 408,240 | |||||||||
Trade payable converted to note payable |
| | 83,948 | |||||||||
Issuance of warrants for return of common stock |
| | 50,852 | |||||||||
Detachable warrants issued with notes payable |
| | 450,000 | |||||||||
Purchases of equipment, which are included in accounts
payable |
| 12,382 | 3,825 | |||||||||
Unrealized loss on short-term investments |
| 7,333 | |
11. Severance Related Expenses
In January 2009, as part of a restructuring to reduce operating costs, we completed a work force reduction of six employees. As a result of the work force reduction, in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, we recorded severance-related charges of $174,000, of which $86,000 was recorded in research and development and the remainder in selling, general, and administrative. In connection with the January 2009 reduction in workforce, severance-related charges of $144,000 were recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and the remainder was recorded in the second quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, all severance-related costs related to the January 2009 work-force reduction had been paid. |
On April 3, 2009, we completed a work force reduction of nine employees. As a result of the work force reduction, we recorded severance-related charges of $160,000, of which $101,000 was recorded in research and development and the remainder in selling, general and administrative. In connection with the April 2009 reduction in workforce, severance-related charges of $114,000 were recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and the remainder was recorded in the second quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, all severance-related costs related to the work-force reduction that we completed in April 2009 had been paid. |
12. Equity Transaction
In June 2009, we completed an approximately $2.0 million registered direct equity financing involving the issuance of shares of our 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into 18,036,199 shares of our common stock, and warrants to purchase up to 8,116,290 shares of our common stock. We received approximately $1.7 million in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. We may receive up to approximately $1.2 million of additional proceeds from the exercise of the warrants issued in that offering; however, those warrants are not exercisable until December 13, 2009 and their exercise is subject to certain ownership limitations. In connection with the June 2009 financing, we also issued warrants to purchase up to 901,810 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share to the placement agent in the offering as additional consideration for its services. The placement agents warrant is not exercisable until December 13, 2009. All of the shares of convertible preferred stock issued in the financing have been converted and, as a result, an additional 18,036,199 shares of our common stock have been issued since March 31, 2009 and are outstanding. |
The convertible feature of the preferred shares and the terms of the warrants provide for a rate of conversion or exercise that was below market value at issuance. Such feature, as it specifically relates to the convertible feature of the preferred shares, is characterized as a Beneficial Conversion Feature (BCF). Pursuant to EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios (EITF 98-5) and EITF No. 00-27, Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, the estimated relative fair values of the preferred shares and the warrants were calculated as approximately $1,232,000 and $506,000, respectively. The value of the BCF was determined by the intrinsic value method and calculated as approximately $1.2 million, which, because the convertible preferred stock did not have a stated redemption date, was fully realized at the time the convertible preferred stock was issued. The fair value of the warrants was determined by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at the date of issuance. The warrant fair value was determined assuming a five-year term, stock volatility of 155.52%, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.60%. Per the guidance of EITF 98-5, the value of the BCF is treated as a deemed dividend to the preferred stockholders and, due to the potential immediate convertibility of the preferred stock at issuance, was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit at the time of issuance. |
12
Table of Contents
13. Subsequent Events
In July 2009, we completed an approximately $1.4 million registered direct equity financing involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into 9,504,189 shares of our common stock. The 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue a 5% dividend until July 6, 2014. If the convertible preferred stock is converted at any time prior to July 6, 2014, we will pay the holder an amount equal to the total dividend that would accrue on the convertible preferred stock from the conversion date through July 6, 2014, or $250 per $1,000 of stated value of convertible preferred shares converted, less any dividend payments made with respect to such converted convertible preferred shares. We received approximately $1.2 million in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. Twenty-five percent, or approximately $340,250, of the gross proceeds were placed in an escrow account, which amounts will be released to make the dividend and other payments described above. Total gross proceeds of approximately $1.4 million were received on June 29, 2009 and, as of June 30, 2009, included in cash. However, because as of June 30, 2009 all conditions to closing had not occurred and the convertible preferred stock had not been issued, the proceeds are included in accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2009. In connection with the July 2009 financing, we also issued warrants to purchase up to 475,209 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.179 per share to the placement agent in the offering as additional consideration for its services. The placement agents warrant is not exercisable until January 7, 2010. All of the shares of convertible preferred stock issued in the financing have subsequently been converted and, as a result, an additional 9,504,189 shares of our common stock have been issued since June 30, 2009 and are outstanding. In connection with the conversion of shares of our then-outstanding 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, we paid the holders thereof an amount equal to $250 per $1,000 of stated value of such shares, which amount was in lieu of our obligation to pay cumulative dividends at the rate per share (as a percentage of the stated value of $1,000 per share, subject to adjustment) of 5% per annum until July 6, 2014 on a quarterly basis beginning on October 1, 2009. |
In July 2009, we increased the annual base salaries of Mr. Culley and Mr. Keran to $315,000 and $289,000, respectively, which increases were retroactive to January 1, 2009, and we adopted a 2009 mid-year incentive plan and a retention and severance plan. As a part of adopting these plans, we terminated the retention and incentive agreements we entered into with each of Mr. Culley and Mr. Keran in January 2009 and the awards of restricted stock units, representing the right to receive 1,200,000 and 850,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock, that we granted to Mr. Culley and Mr. Keran in January 2009. Under the incentive plan, each of Mr. Culley and Mr. Keran are eligible for incentive awards based upon the achievement of corporate performance objectives in effect at the end of 2009. Awards generally will be paid in cash. The potential award of each of Mr. Culley and Mr. Keran will be based 100% on our achievement of corporate objectives and the target award amount for each of them is $150,000. The target amount of each award may be increased or decreased by multiplying the target amount by a corporate performance multiplier, as will be determined by the compensation committee of our board of directors in the first quarter of 2010. Award multipliers will range from zero to 1.5. Payment of awards under the incentive plan are expected to be made after December 31, 2009 and on or before March 14, 2010. Under the retention plan, if the employment of Mr. Culley or Mr. Keran, as applicable, terminates at any time as a result of an involuntary termination, and such employee delivers and does not revoke a general release of claims, which will also confirm any post-termination obligations and/or restrictions applicable to such employee, such employee will be entitled to an amount equal to twelve (12) months of such employees then-current base salary, less applicable withholdings, and an amount equal to the estimated cost of continuing such employees health care coverage and the coverage of such employees dependents who are covered at the time of the involuntary termination under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, for a period equal to twelve (12) months. These severance benefits will be paid in a lump-sum on the date the general release of claims becomes effective. Our aggregate contractual obligation under the retention plan, including applicable payroll and employer taxes, is approximately $650,000. |
In July 2009, we appointed Patrick Keran, our general counsel, secretary and vice-president, legal, to additionally serve as our interim principal financial and accounting officer. |
In July 2009, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to register an undetermined number of shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which convertible preferred stock currently is not designated, warrants to purchase an undetermined number of shares of our common stock and an undetermined number of shares of our common stock underlying the convertible preferred stock and the warrants. |
13
Table of Contents
In July 2009, the NYSE Amex staff notified us that it had determined that the plan we submitted to it made a reasonable demonstration of our ability to regain compliance with the NYSE Amexs continued listing standards, and that it had determined to grant an extension until December 1, 2010 for us to regain compliance with the NYSE Amexs continued listing standards. During this extension period, we will be subject to periodic review to determine whether we are making progress consistent with our plan. If we do not show progress consistent with our plan, the NYSE Amex staff will review the circumstances and may immediately commence delisting proceedings. In June 2009, we were notified by the NYSE Amex staff that we were not in compliance with the NYSE Amexs continued listing standards as set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE Amexs Company Guide. In order to maintain our listing, the NYSE Amex required us to submit a plan by July 1, 2009 addressing how we intend to regain compliance by December 1, 2010, which plan was submitted timely. |
In August 2009, we completed an approximately $0.9 million registered direct equity financing involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into 9,092,307 shares of our common stock. The 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue a 5% dividend until February 10, 2012. If the convertible preferred stock is converted at any time prior to February 10, 2012, we will pay the holder an amount equal to the total dividend that would accrue on the convertible preferred stock from the conversion date through February 10, 2012, or $125 per $1,000 of stated value of convertible preferred shares converted, less any dividend payments made with respect to such converted convertible preferred shares. We received approximately $0.8 million in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. Twelve and one-half percent, or $115,250, of the gross proceeds were placed in an escrow account, which amounts will be released to make the dividend and other payments described above. |
In accordance with SFAS No. 165, we have evaluated subsequent events through the date and time the financial statements were issued on August 12, 2009. |
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, this discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements.
Overview
We are a development-stage specialty pharmaceutical company whose fundamental business is
focused on in-licensing, developing and commercializing proprietary product candidates for the
treatment of cancer. We seek to improve the performance of existing treatments by addressing
limitations associated principally with their safety and use. Our lead product candidates, ANX-530
and ANX-514, are novel emulsion formulations of currently marketed chemotherapy drugs. We have
devoted substantially all of our resources to research and development, or R&D, or to acquisition
of our product candidates. We have not yet marketed or sold any products or generated any
significant revenue.
We have incurred annual net losses since inception. We had a net loss of $2.6 million in the
second quarter of 2009 and cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5.4 million and working
capital of $2.2 million at June 30, 2009. Included in the net loss at June 30, 2009 was a portion
of the expenses associated with the manufacturing activities related to submitting a new drug
application, or NDA, for ANX-530 that we re-started following the completion of our June 2009
equity financing (discussed below). Our working capital at June 30, 2009 reflects a liability of
approximately $1.4 million related to the gross proceeds we received on June 29, 2009 in
anticipation of the closing of our July 2009 financing (discussed below). These factors raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements for the period ended and at June 30, 2009 have been prepared
assuming we will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of
our assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business and does not
include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary
should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
On June 12, 2009, we completed an approximately $2.0 million registered direct equity
financing, involving the issuance and sale of shares of our 0% Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock, convertible into 18,036,199 shares of our common stock, and warrants to purchase up to
8,116,290 shares of our common stock. We received approximately $1.7 million in net proceeds from
the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. We
may receive up to approximately $1.2 million of additional proceeds from the exercise of the
warrants issued in that offering; however, those warrants are not exercisable until December 13,
2009 and their exercise is subject to certain ownership limitations. In connection with the
offering, we also issued warrants to purchase up to 901,810 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.15 per share to our placement agent in consideration for its services.
On July 6, 2009, we completed an approximately $1.4 million registered direct equity financing
involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into
9,504,189 shares of our common stock. We received approximately $1.2 million in net proceeds from
the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. The
convertible preferred shares were to accrue a 5% dividend until July 6, 2014, unless converted
prior to such date. Upon any conversion of these preferred shares we were obligated to pay the
holder an amount equal to the total dividend that would have otherwise accrued on the shares
through July 6, 2014, less any dividend payment previously made with respect to such converted
shares. Twenty-five percent, or $340,250, of the gross proceeds of the financing were placed in an
escrow account for payment of the dividend and conversion amounts payable on the 5% Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock. All of the shares of the 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock have
been converted and, pursuant to the terms of the 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, we paid
an aggregate of $340,250 from the escrow account to the holder of the converted preferred shares in
connection with such conversions.
All of the shares of our 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 5% Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock issued in the June and July 2009 financings have been converted and, as a result,
an additional 27,540,388 shares of our common stock have been issued since March 31, 2009.
15
Table of Contents
On August 10, 2009, we completed an approximately $0.9 million registered direct equity
financing involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock,
convertible into 9,092,307 shares of our common stock. The 5%
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue a 5% dividend until February 10, 2012. If the
convertible preferred stock is converted at any time prior to February 10, 2012, we will pay the
holder an amount equal to the total dividend that would accrue on the convertible preferred stock
from the conversion date through February 10, 2012, or $125 per $1,000 of stated value of
convertible preferred shares converted, less any dividend payments made with respect to such
converted convertible preferred shares. We received approximately $0.8 million in net proceeds from
the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses.
Twelve and one-half percent, or $115,250, of the gross proceeds were placed in an escrow account,
which amounts will be released to make the dividend and other payments described above.
Following the completion of the June 2009 financing, we re-started the final manufacturing
activities related to submitting an NDA for ANX-530 to seek approval of the FDA to market ANX-530
in the U.S. In addition, we continue to evaluate the data from our recently-completed
bioequivalence study of ANX-514 (docetaxel emulsion) and we plan to seek a meeting with the FDA to
discuss the results. However, even following our recent financings, we may need to raise
substantial additional capital to fund our operations, including activities relating to the
commercialization of ANX-530 in the U.S., if an NDA for ANX-530 is submitted and approved by the
FDA, and activities relating to the development and regulatory review process and, ultimately,
commercialization of ANX-514.
There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing on a timely
basis, or at all. If we are unable to raise sufficient additional capital on a timely basis to
continue our fundamental business operations, we may seek protection under the provisions of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code or liquidate our assets and wind-up our operations. If we pursue an orderly
liquidation of our assets, based on our current working capital and the estimated costs associated
with seeking approval for and implementing a liquidation plan, we expect the remaining cash
available for distribution to our stockholders, if any, to be insignificant.
Our business was incorporated in Delaware in December 1995. In October 2000, we merged our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Biokeys Acquisition Corp., with and into Biokeys, Inc. and changed our
name to Biokeys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In May 2003, we merged Biokeys, Inc., our wholly-owned
subsidiary, with and into us and changed our name to ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In July 2004,
we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, ADVENTRX (Europe) Ltd., in the United Kingdom primarily to
facilitate conducting clinical trials in the European Union and to obtain favorable pricing for
discussions with the European Medicines Agency. In April 2006, we acquired SD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Our executive offices are located at 6725 Mesa Ridge Road, Suite 100,
San Diego, California 92121, and our telephone number is (858) 552-0866. Our corporate website is
located at www.adventrx.com.
We are developing commercial names for our product candidates. All trademarks, service marks
or trade names appearing in this report, including but not limited to Navelbine® and
Taxotere®, are the property of their respective owners. Use or display by us of other
parties trademarks, service marks, trade names, trade dress or products is not intended to and
does not imply a relationship with, or endorsements or sponsorship of, us by the trademark, service
mark, trade name, trade dress or product owners.
NYSE Amex
On June 1, 2009, we were notified by the NYSE Amex staff that we were not in compliance with
the NYSE Amexs continued listing standards as set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE Amexs Company
Guide. In order to maintain our listing, the NYSE Amex required that we submit a plan by July 1,
2009 addressing how we intend to regain compliance by December 1, 2010, which plan was submitted
timely. On July 31, 2009, the NYSE Amex staff notified us that it had determined that our plan made
a reasonable demonstration of our ability to regain compliance with the NYSE Amexs continued
listing standards, and had determined to grant an extension until December 1, 2010 for us to regain
compliance with the NYSE Amexs continued listing standards. During this extension period, we will
be subject to periodic review to determine whether we are making progress consistent with our plan.
If we do not show progress consistent with our plan, the NYSE Amex staff will review the
circumstances and may immediately commence delisting proceedings.
On June 1, 2009, the NYSE Amex staff indicated that we are not in compliance with Section
1003(a)(ii) of the NYSE Amex Company Guide with stockholders equity of less than $4,000,000 and
losses from continuing operations and net losses in three of our four most recent fiscal years and
Section 1003(a)(iii) of the NYSE Amex Company Guide with stockholders equity of less than
$6,000,000 and losses from continuing operations and net losses in our five most recent fiscal
years.
Potential Increase of Authorized Common Stock and Reverse Stock Split
Our board of directors has called a special meeting of our stockholders to be held on August
25, 2009. We have recommended to our stockholders that, at this special meeting, they approve (1)
increasing the total number of authorized shares of common stock from 200,000,000 shares to 500,000,000 shares, with a corresponding increase in the total number of
shares which we are authorized to issue from 201,000,000 to 501,000,000, through the filing of a
Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and (2)
authorizing our board of directors to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock
at a ratio in the discretion of the board of directors that is not less than 2:1 nor greater than
50:1.
16
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
consolidated financial statements that we have prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires management to make a number of assumptions and estimates that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates and
assumptions, including those related to recognition of expenses in service contracts, license
agreements, share-based compensation and registration payment arrangements. Management bases its
estimates on historical information and assumptions believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletin Topic 13, Revenue Recognition, or Topic 13, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue, or
EITF, No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, or EITF 00-21. Revenue is
recognized when all of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the sellers price to the
buyer is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Revenue from licensing agreements is recognized based on the performance requirements of the
agreement. Revenue is deferred for fees received before earned. Nonrefundable upfront fees that are
not contingent on any future performance by us are recognized as revenue when the license term
commences and the revenue recognition criteria under Topic 13 and EITF 00-21 are met. Nonrefundable
upfront fees, where we have ongoing involvement or performance obligations, are recorded as
deferred revenue and recognized as revenue over the life of the contract, the period of the
performance obligation or the development period, whichever is appropriate in light of the
circumstances.
Payments related to substantive, performance-based milestones in an agreement are recognized
as revenue upon the achievement of the milestones as specified in the underlying agreement when
they represent the culmination of the earnings process. Royalty revenue from licensed products will
be recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the applicable license agreements.
R&D Expenses. R&D expenses consist of expenses incurred in performing R&D activities,
including salaries and benefits, facilities and other overhead expenses, bioequivalence and
clinical trials, research-related manufacturing services, contract services and other outside
expenses. R&D expenses are charged to operations as the underlying work is performed. Advance
payments, including nonrefundable amounts, for goods or services that will be used or rendered for
future R&D activities are deferred and capitalized. Such amounts will be recognized as an expense
as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. If the goods will not be
delivered, or services will not be rendered, then the capitalized advance payment is charged to
expense.
Milestone payments that we make in connection with in-licensed technology or product
candidates are expensed as incurred when there is uncertainty in receiving future economic benefits
from the licensed technology or product candidates. We consider the future economic benefits from
the licensed technology or product candidates to be uncertain until such licensed technology is
incorporated into products that, or such product candidates, are approved for marketing by the FDA
or when other significant risk factors are abated. For accounting purposes, management has viewed
future economic benefits for all of our licensed technology or product candidates to be uncertain.
Payments in connection with our bioequivalence and clinical trials are often made under
contracts with multiple contract research organizations that conduct and manage these trials on our
behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from contract
to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Generally, these agreements set forth the scope
of work to be performed at a fixed fee or unit price or on a time-and-material basis. Payments
under these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment or treatment of patients
or the completion of other milestones. Expenses related to bioequivalence and clinical trials are
accrued based on our estimates and/or representations from service providers regarding work
performed, including actual level of patient enrollment, completion of patient studies, and trial
progress. Other incidental costs related to patient enrollment or treatment are accrued when
reasonably certain. If the contracted amounts are modified (for instance, as a result of changes in
the bioequivalence or clinical trial protocol or scope of work to be performed), we modify our
accruals accordingly on a prospective basis.
17
Table of Contents
Revisions in scope of contract are charged to expense in the period in which the facts that
give rise to the revision become reasonably certain. Because of the uncertainty of possible future
changes to the scope of work in bioequivalence and clinical trials contracts, we are unable to
quantify an estimate of the reasonably likely effect of any such changes on our consolidated
results of operations or financial position. Historically, we have had no material changes in our
bioequivalence and clinical trial expense accruals that would have had a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Purchased In-Process Research and Development. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, through December 31, 2008, we accounted for the costs associated with any purchased
in-process research and development, or IPR&D, to the statement of operations upon acquisition.
These amounts represent an estimate of the fair value of purchased IPR&D for projects that, as of
the acquisition date, had not yet reached technological feasibility, had no alternative future use,
and had uncertainty in generating future economic benefits. We determine the future economic
benefits from the purchased IPR&D to be uncertain until such technology is incorporated into
products approved for marketing by the FDA or when other significant risk factors are abated.
We adopted SFAS No. 141(R)-1, Business Combinations, effective for fiscal years beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have a material effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Share-based Compensation Expenses. Effective January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based
compensation awards granted to employees, including non-employee members of our board of directors,
in accordance with the revised SFAS No. 123, Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123R, including the
provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 107 and No. 110. Share-based compensation expense is
measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as
expense over the employees requisite service period. As of June 30, 2009, we had no awards with
market or performance conditions other than the restricted stock units that we granted in January
2009, which would have vest, if at all, immediately prior to a strategic transaction (as defined in
the documentation evidencing the grant of the units); however, as of July 31, 2009, we did not have
outstanding any restricted stock unit awards. As share-based compensation expense is based on
awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on
historical experience. Although estimates of share-based compensation expenses are significant to
our consolidated financial statements, they are not related to the payment of any cash by us. Prior
to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based compensation under the recognition and measurement
principles of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, or Black-Scholes model. The determination of the fair value of share-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our share price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables
include, but are not limited to, our expected share price volatility over the term of the awards,
actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, a risk-free interest rate and
expected dividends. We may elect to use different assumptions under the Black-Scholes model in the
future, which could materially affect our net income or loss and net income or loss per share.
We account for share-based compensation awards granted to non-employees in accordance with
EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, or EITF 96-18. Under EITF 96-18, we
determine the fair value of the share-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of
the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more
reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured
using the share price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of (1) the date at which
a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (2)
the date at which the counterpartys performance is complete.
Income Taxes. In June 2006, FASB issued Financial Interpretation No., or FIN, 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 provides that the tax effects from an uncertain
tax position can be recognized in our consolidated financial statements only if the position is
more likely than not of being sustained upon an examination by tax authorities. An uncertain income
tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 were effective
for us as of January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle
recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. We adopted FIN 48
on January 1, 2007, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position.
18
Table of Contents
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, as part of a restructuring to
reduce operating costs, in January 2009, we completed a work force reduction of six employees. As
a result of the reduction in force, we recorded severance-related charges of $174,000, of which
$86,000 was recorded in R&D and the remainder in selling, general and administrative, or SG&A. In
connection with the January 2009 reduction in workforce, severance-related charges of $144,000 were
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and the remainder was recorded in the second quarter of 2009.
As part of additional restructuring to reduce operating costs, in April 2009, we completed a
workforce reduction of nine employees. As a result of the reduction in force, we recorded
severance-related charges of $160,000, of which $101,000 was recorded in R&D and the remainder in
SG&A. In connection with the April 2009 reduction in workforce, severance-related charges of
$114,000 were recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and the remainder was recorded in the second
quarter of 2009.
Convertible Instruments. In accordance with EITF 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities
with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios and EITF 00-27,
Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, we value separately at issuance
embedded beneficial conversion features present in convertible securities. Embedded beneficial
conversion features are recognized by allocating to additional paid-in capital and accumulated
deficit that portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the convertible security equal to the
intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature. Intrinsic value is calculated as the
difference, as of the commitment date, between the conversion price of the convertible security and
the fair value of the common stock underlying the convertible security, which for us is the closing
price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE Amex (formerly, the American Stock Exchange),
multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock into which the convertible security is
convertible. If the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is greater than the net
proceeds allocated to the convertible security, the amount of the discount assigned to the
beneficial conversion feature is limited to the amount of the net proceeds. In our June 2009
equity financing, we issued convertible preferred stock with a non-detachable conversion feature
that was in-the-money as of the commitment date, which we recognized as a beneficial conversion
feature. The convertible preferred stock subsequently was converted into common stock at a fixed
conversion rate. The embedded beneficial conversion feature was valued separately and recognized by
allocating to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit a portion of the net proceeds
equal to the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature.
The foregoing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In
most cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Results of Operations
A general understanding of the drug development process is critical to understanding our
results of operations. Drug development in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world is a
process that includes several steps defined by the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in
foreign countries. The FDA approval processes relating to new drugs differ, depending on the nature
of the particular drug for which approval is sought. With respect to any drug product with active
ingredients not previously approved by the FDA, a prospective drug manufacturer is required to
submit a new drug application, or NDA, which includes complete reports of pre-clinical, clinical
and laboratory studies and extensive manufacturing information to prove such products safety and
effectiveness. The NDA process generally requires, before the submission of the NDA, filing of an
investigational new drug application, or IND, pursuant to which permission is sought to begin
clinical testing of the new drug product. An NDA based on published safety and effectiveness
studies conducted by others, or previous findings of safety and effectiveness by the FDA, may be
submitted under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA. Development
of new formulations of pharmaceutical products under Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA may have shorter
timelines than those associated with developing new chemical entities.
Generally, with respect to any drug product with active ingredients not previously approved by
the FDA, an NDA must be supported by data from at least phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 clinical
trials. Phase 1 clinical trials can be expected to last from 6 to 18 months, phase 2 clinical
trials can be expected to last from 12 to 24 months and phase 3 clinical trials can be expected to
last from 18 to 36 months. However, clinical development timelines vary widely, as do the total
costs of clinical trials and the likelihood of success. We anticipate that we will make
determinations as to which of our programs to pursue and how much funding to direct to each program
on an ongoing basis in response to the scientific and clinical success of the underlying product
candidate, our ongoing assessment of its market potential and our available resources. In March
2009, due to an immediate need to raise additional capital to continue our business, we suspended
substantially all of our development activities and fundamental business operations to conserve
cash while we evaluated strategic options, pursued financing alternatives and considered whether to
liquidate our assets, wind-up operations and distribute any remaining cash to our stockholders.
Following the completion of our June 2009 equity financing, we re-started certain development
activities and fundamental business operations relating to ANX-530 and ANX-514.
19
Table of Contents
Future expenditures on R&D programs are subject to many uncertainties, including whether our
product candidates will be further developed with a partner or independently. At this time, due to
such uncertainties and the risks inherent in drug development and the associated regulatory
process, we cannot estimate with reasonable certainty the duration of or costs to complete our R&D
programs or whether or when or to what extent revenues will be generated from the commercialization
and sale of any of our product candidates. The duration and costs of our R&D programs, in
particular those associated with bioequivalence trials and research-related manufacturing, can vary
significantly among programs as a result of a variety of factors, including:
| the number and location of sites included in trials and the rate of site approval for the trial; | ||
| the rates of patient recruitment and enrollment; | ||
| the ratio of randomized to evaluable patients; | ||
| the availability and cost of reference product in the jurisdiction of each site; | ||
| the time and cost of process development activities related to our product candidates; | ||
| the costs of manufacturing our product candidates; and | ||
| the costs, requirements, timing of and the ability to secure regulatory approvals. |
The difficult process of seeking regulatory approvals for our product candidates and compliance
with applicable regulations requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Any failure by us to
obtain, or any delay in obtaining, regulatory approvals could cause our R&D expenditures to
increase and, in turn, have a material and unfavorable effect on our results of operations. We
cannot be certain when, if ever, we will generate revenues from sales of any of our products.
While many of our R&D expenses are transacted in U.S. dollars, certain significant expenses are
required to be paid in foreign currencies and expose us to transaction gains and losses that could
result from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In particular, our current contract
manufacturer for both ANX-530 and ANX-514 is located outside the U.S. and generally we pay for its
services, including the final manufacturing activities related to submitting an NDA for ANX-530, in
Euros. As a result, our exposure to currency risk likely will increase as we move our products
towards commercialization and increase the services we request from our current contract
manufacturer. We include realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions in operations
as incurred.
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenue. No revenue was recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2009. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, we recognized $0.5 million in licensing revenue related to ANX-211, which
represents a portion of a $0.6 million settlement payment to us by Theragenex, LLC. We settled a
dispute with Theragenex in May 2008. Consistent with our revenue recognition policy, we recognized
the license fee as revenue in the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 because, in that period,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, services had been rendered, the amount of the
payment was fixed and determinable and collectability was reasonably assured. The remainder of the
$0.6 million settlement payment was recorded as other income.
We have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we do not expect to generate
revenue from product sales until such time that we have obtained approval from a regulatory agency
to sell one of our product candidates, the timing of which, if it occurs at all, we cannot
currently predict
R&D Expenses. We maintain and evaluate our R&D expenses by the type of cost incurred rather than by
project. We maintain and evaluate R&D expenses by type primarily because of the uncertainties
described above, as well as because we out-source a substantial portion of our work and,
historically, our R&D personnel work across multiple programs rather than dedicating their time to
one particular program. We began maintaining such expenses by type on January 1, 2005. The
following table summarizes our consolidated R&D expenses by type for the three months ended June
30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, and for the period from January 1, 2005 through June
30, 2009:
20
Table of Contents
January 1, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, | through | |||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ Variance | % Variance | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
External clinical study fees
and expenses |
$ | (44,143 | ) | $ | 952,345 | $ | (996,488 | ) | (105 | %) | $ | 23,734,329 | ||||||||
External non-clinical study
fees and expenses (1) |
1,325,361 | 2,651,533 | (1,326,172 | ) | (50 | %) | 20,741,083 | |||||||||||||
Personnel costs |
131,875 | 767,729 | (635,854 | ) | (83 | %) | 10,266,499 | |||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
41,803 | 139,788 | (97,985 | ) | (70 | %) | 2,900,587 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,454,896 | $ | 4,511,395 | $ | (3,056,499 | ) | (68 | %) | $ | 57,642,498 | |||||||||
(1) | External non-clinical study fees and expenses include preclinical, research-related manufacturing, quality assurance and regulatory expenses. |
R&D expenses decreased by $3.1 million, or 68%, to $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009, compared to $4.5 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to
a $1.1 million decrease in external clinical trial expenses related to ANX-510, a $0.1 million
decrease in external clinical trial expenses related to ANX-514, a $1.2 million decrease in
non-clinical expenses related to ANX-514, a $0.6 million decrease in personnel expenses and a $0.1
million decrease in share-based compensation expense. We expect that our reductions in full-time
employees will result in further R&D cost savings. However, we also expect such cost-savings will
be offset in part or entirely by costs related to our re-started activities related to ANX-530 and
ANX-514.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses decreased by $1.6 million, or 59%, to
$1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $2.6 million for the comparable
period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in personnel costs, a
$0.1 million decrease in share-based compensation expense, a $0.2 million decrease in legal and
professional services, a $0.1 million decrease in market research expenses and a $0.1 million
decrease in travel expenses. We expect SG&A expenses to continue to decline given our reductions
in full-time employees. However, we also expect such cost-savings will be offset in part or
entirely by costs related to capital-raising activities, which costs will be expensed unless and
until the closing of the applicable capital-raising transaction.
Interest and Other Income/Expense. Interest income and other income decreased by $0.3 million, or
116%, to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $0.3 million for the comparable
period in 2008, which 2008 period included $0.1 of other income related to our settlement with
Theragenex in May 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.2 million decrease in
interest income based on lower cash balances and a $0.1 million decrease in other income. Unless we
are successful in raising a substantial amount of additional capital, we expect that interest
income will continue to be negligible.
Net Loss. Net loss applicable to common stock was $3.8 million, or $0.04 per share, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to a net loss applicable to common stock of $6.4 million, or
$0.07 per share, for the comparable period in 2008. Included in the net loss applicable to common
stock for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was a non-cash deemed dividend expense of
approximately $1.2 million related to our June 2009 equity financing. Net loss for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, which does not reflect the deemed dividend expense, was $2.6 million.
Included in both net loss and net loss applicable to common stock for the three months ended June
30, 2009 were charges associated with our October 2008 and January and March 2009 reductions in
force.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenue. Revenue recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 represents a $0.3 million
nonrefundable license fee under our March 2009 license agreement with respect to ANX-514 with Shin
Poong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Consistent with our revenue recognition policy, we recognized the
license fee as revenue in the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 because, in that period,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, services had been rendered, the amount of the
payment was fixed and determinable and collectability was reasonably assured. Licensing revenue
related to our settlement with Theragenex in May 2008 of $0.5 million was recognized for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
R&D Expenses. The following table summarizes our consolidated R&D expenses by type for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, and for the period from January 1,
2005 through June 30, 2009:
21
Table of Contents
January 1, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | through | |||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ Variance | % Variance | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
External clinical study fees
and expenses |
$ | 534,851 | $ | 1,974,265 | $ | (1,439,414 | ) | (73 | %) | $ | 23,734,329 | |||||||||
External non-clinical study
fees and expenses (1) |
1,795,609 | 4,070,518 | (2,274,909 | ) | (56 | %) | 20,741,083 | |||||||||||||
Personnel costs |
755,311 | 1,841,435 | (1,086,124 | ) | (59 | %) | 10,266,499 | |||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
16,426 | 445,484 | (429,058 | ) | (96 | %) | 2,900,587 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,102,197 | $ | 8,331,702 | $ | (5,229,505 | ) | (63 | %) | $ | 57,642,498 | |||||||||
(1) | External non-clinical study fees and expenses include preclinical, research-related manufacturing, quality assurance and regulatory expenses. |
R&D expenses decreased by $5.2 million, or 63%, to $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009, compared to $8.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to
a $1.3 million decrease in external clinical trial expenses related to ANX-510, a $1.8 million
decrease in non-clinical expenses related to ANX-514, a $0.2 million decrease in non-clinical
expenses related to ANX-201 and ANX-211, a $0.2 million decrease in non-clinical expenses related
to ANX-530, a $1.1 million decrease in personnel costs and a $0.5 million decrease in share-based
compensation expense, offset by a $0.1 million increase in external clinical trial expenses related
to ANX-514.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses decreased by $2.2 million, or 43%, to
$2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $5.0 million for the comparable
period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in personnel costs, a
$0.3 million decrease related to share-based compensation expense, a $0.4 million decrease in legal
and professional services, a $0.1 million decrease in market research expenses, a $0.2 million
decrease in travel expenses, and a $0.1 million decrease in insurance related expenses.
Interest and Other Income/Expense. Interest income and other income decreased by $0.6 million, or
107%, to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $0.6 million for the comparable
period in 2008, which 2008 period included $0.1 of other income related to our settlement with
Theragenex in May 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.5 million decrease in
interest income based on lower cash balances and a $0.1 million decrease in other income.
Net Loss. Net loss applicable to common stock was $7.0 million, or $0.08 per share, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to a net loss applicable to common stock of $12.4 million, or
$0.14 per share, for the comparable period in 2008. Included in the net loss applicable to common
stock for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was a non-cash deemed dividend expense of
approximately $1.2 million related to our June 2009 equity financing. Net loss for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, which does not reflect the deemed dividend expense, was $5.8 million.
Included in both net loss and net loss applicable to common stock for the six months ended June 30,
2009 were charges associated with our October 2008 and January and March 2009 reductions in force.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have a history of recurring losses from operations and we have funded our operations
primarily through sales of our equity securities. We had a net loss of $2.6 million in the second
quarter of 2009 and cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5.4 million and working capital of
$2.2 million at June 30, 2009.
On June 12, 2009, we completed an approximately $2.0 million registered direct equity
financing involving the issuance of shares of our 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
convertible into 18,036,199 shares of our common stock, and warrants to purchase up to 8,116,290
shares of our common stock. We received approximately $1.7 million in net proceeds from the
offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. All of
the shares of the 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock subsequently have been converted. We may
receive up to approximately $1.2 million of additional proceeds from the exercise of the warrants
issued in that offering; however, those warrants are not exercisable until December 13, 2009 and
their exercise is subject to certain ownership limitations. In connection with the offering, we
also issued warrants to purchase up to 901,810 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$0.15 per share to the placement agent in the offering as additional consideration for its
services. The placement agents warrant is not exercisable until December 13, 2009.
22
Table of Contents
On July 6, 2009, we completed an approximately $1.4 million registered direct equity financing
involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into
9,504,189 shares of our common stock. We received approximately $1.2 million in net proceeds from
the offering, after deducting the placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. The
convertible preferred shares were to accrue a 5% dividend until July 6, 2014, unless converted
prior to such date. Upon any conversion of these preferred shares we were obligated to pay the
holder an amount equal to the total dividend that would have otherwise accrued on the shares
through July 6, 2014, less any dividend payment previously made with respect to such converted
shares. Twenty-five percent, or $340,250, of the gross proceeds of the financing were placed in an
escrow account for payment of the dividend and conversion amounts payable on the 5% Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock. All of the shares of the 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
subsequently have been converted and, pursuant to the terms of the 5% Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock, we paid an aggregate of $340,250 from the escrow account to the holder of the
converted preferred shares in connection with such conversions. In connection with the offering, we
also issued warrants to purchase up to 475,209 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$0.179 per share to the placement agent in the offering as additional consideration for its
services. The placement agents warrant is not exercisable until January 7, 2010.
On July 24, 2009, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to sell an undetermined number
of shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which convertible preferred stock currently
is not designated, warrants to purchase an undetermined number of shares of our common stock and an
undetermined number of shares of our common stock underlying the convertible preferred stock and
the warrants.
On August 10, 2009, we completed an approximately $0.9 million registered direct equity
financing involving the issuance of shares of our 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock,
convertible into 9,092,307 shares of our common stock. The 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
will accrue a 5% dividend until February 10, 2012. If the convertible preferred stock is converted
at any time prior to February 10, 2012, we will pay the holder an amount equal to the total
dividend that would accrue on the convertible preferred stock from the conversion date through
February 10, 2012, or $125 per $1,000 of stated value of convertible preferred shares converted,
less any dividend payments made with respect to such converted convertible preferred shares. We
received approximately $0.8 million in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the
placement agents fees and our estimated offering expenses. Twelve and one-half percent, or
$115,250, of the gross proceeds were placed in an escrow account, which amounts will be released to
make the dividend and other payments described above.
We have an on-going need to raise additional capital to support our operations, which
historically we have done primarily through the issuance of our equity securities. Despite the
completion of our June 2009, our July 2009 and our August 2009 equity financings, in the current
financial and economic environment it is uncertain that we can obtain additional funding through
our traditional sources of capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. We expect to incur substantial costs in connection with activities
relating to submitting an NDA for ANX-530, advancing ANX-530 toward commercialization in the U.S.
and continuing development and regulatory related activities for ANX-514. We may also incur
substantial costs in connection with evaluating, negotiating and consummating future
capital-raising and/or strategic or partnering transactions or liquidating our assets and
winding-up our operations. We cannot currently predict the extent of these costs. Even if we incur
costs in pursuing, evaluating and negotiating particular capital-raising and/or strategic or
partnering transactions, our efforts may not prove successful. Excluding the potentially
significant costs associated with evaluating, negotiating and consummating capital-raising and/or
strategic or partnering transactions or seeking protection under the provisions of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code or liquidating our assets and winding-up our operations, we anticipate that our
cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2009, together with the net proceeds from the equity
financings we completed on July 6, 2009 and August 10, 2009, will be sufficient to permit us to
conduct our business through at least December 31, 2009. We will need to raise substantial
additional capital to continue our business after this period.
Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $6.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $11.5 million for the comparable period in 2008. The
decrease in cash used in operating activities was primarily due to reductions in development
activities and fundamental business operations, as well as a $0.3 million increase in licensing
revenue. We expect cash used in operating activities will increase during the next quarterly
period as a result of our re-starting development activities related to ANX-530 and ANX-514 in June
2009.
Investing Activities. There was no net cash provided by investing activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $9.4 million
for the comparable period in 2008.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. There was no cash provided by financing activities for the comparable
period in 2008.
23
Table of Contents
Accrued Compensation and Payroll Taxes. Accrued compensation and payroll taxes were $0.3
million at June 30, 2009, compared to $0.9 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $0.6
million, or 67%. The decrease was primarily due to the paying-down of severance-related expenses
associated with our October 2008 and January and March 2009 reductions in staff.
Management Outlook
We have an on-going need to raise additional capital to support our operations. Despite the
equity financings we completed on June 12, 2009, July 6, 2009 and August 10, 2009, we believe our
ability to raise capital has been adversely affected by the current financial and economic
environment. In addition, our ability to timely raise capital on commercially reasonable terms may
be limited by requirements, rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
NYSE Amex (formerly, the American Stock Exchange).
Although the funds raised in our June 2009, our July 2009 and our August 2009 equity
financings have enabled us to re-start activities necessary to submit an NDA seeking FDA approval
to market ANX-530 in the U.S. and engage consultants to assist us in analyzing the results of our
recently completed bioequivalence study of ANX-514, we will require substantial additional capital
to commercialize ANX-530 and ANX-514, should either be approved. Currently, in addition to
pursuing activities necessary to submit an ANX-530 NDA and continuing to evaluate the data from the
ANX-514 bioequivalence study, we are focused primarily on raising additional capital as soon as
possible to continue to advance ANX-530 and ANX-514 toward commercialization in the U.S. We also
intend to continue to evaluate any strategic or partnering options, including the sale or exclusive
license of one or more of our product candidate programs, a strategic business merger, co-marketing
partnerships and other similar transactions. However, there can be no assurances that we will
continue to pursue capital-raising transactions or strategic or partnering alternatives or, if we
do, that we will be successful in consummating a transaction on a timely basis, or at all. We
likely will not be able to continue as a going concern unless we raise adequate additional capital.
Given our recent restructuring and cost-cutting measures, our ability to further curtail expenses
to provide additional time to obtain financing or to consummate a strategic or partnering
transaction is limited.
We are unable to predict accurately when, if ever, we will be able to raise additional capital
or the form, structure or terms of any potential strategic or partnering transaction, including
whether we will continue as a going concern, or whether we will seek protection under the
provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or liquidate our assets and entirely wind-up our operations.
As a result, the duration that our existing cash and cash equivalents will sustain our current
operations is uncertain. However, excluding the potentially significant costs associated with
evaluating, negotiating and consummating capital-raising and/or strategic or partnering
transactions or seeking protection under the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or liquidating
our assets and winding-up our operations, we anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents as of
June 30, 2009, together with the net proceeds from the equity financings we completed on July 6,
2009 and August 10, 2009, will be sufficient to permit us to conduct our business through at least
December 31, 2009. We will need to raise substantial additional capital to continue our business
after this period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 8, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements (unaudited) in this report for a discussion of recent accounting announcements
and their effect, if any, on us.
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly in Item 2 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical
fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including, but not limited
to, statements regarding business strategy, expectations and plans, our objectives for future
operations, including product development, and our future financial position. When used in this
report, the words believe, may, could, will, estimate, continue, anticipate,
intend, expect, indicate and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
24
Table of Contents
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections
about future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of
operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and
financial needs, including our ability to consummate a strategic or partnering transaction or
otherwise satisfy our immediate need for additional capital. These forward-looking statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to: the risk that we will be unable to raise sufficient
additional capital on a timely basis to submit an NDA for ANX-530, to fund operations or pre-launch activities during the FDA review
period if an NDA is submitted or launch activities should an NDA for ANX-530 be approved; the risk
that we will be unable to raise sufficient additional capital on a timely basis to continue as a
going concern; the risk that we will seek protection under the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code; the risk that, if we liquidate our assets, the capital available for distribution to
stockholders, if any, will be insignificant; the risk that we will reassess the results of our
ANX-530 bioequivalence study and determine to conduct additional bioequivalence studies of ANX-530,
including in humans; the potential for regulatory authorities to require additional preclinical
work and/or clinical activities to support regulatory filings, including prior to the submission or
the approval of an NDA for ANX-530 and/or ANX-514, which activities may increase the cost and
timeline to NDA submission or approval and negatively impact our ability to raise additional
capital and/or complete a strategic or partnering transaction; the risk the FDA will determine that
ANX-530 and Navelbine and/or ANX-514 and Taxotere are not bioequivalent, including as a result of
performing pharmacokinetic equivalence analysis based on a patient population other than the
population on which we based our analysis or determining that increased docetaxel blood-levels
during and immediately following infusion are clinically relevant; the risk of investigator bias in
reporting adverse events as a result of the open-label nature of the ANX-530 bioequivalence study,
including bias that increased the reporting of adverse events associated with Navelbine and/or that
decreased the reporting of adverse events associated with ANX-530; difficulties or delays in
manufacturing, obtaining regulatory approval for and marketing ANX-530 and ANX-514, including
validating commercial manufacturing processes and manufacturers, as well as suppliers, and the
potential for automatic injunctions regarding FDA approval of ANX-514; the risk that the
performance of third parties on whom we rely to conduct our studies or evaluate the data, including
clinical investigators, expert data monitoring committees, contract laboratories and contract
research organizations, may be substandard, or they may fail to perform as expected; the risk that
our significantly reduced workforce and leadership by officers who do not have substantial previous
experience in executive leadership roles will negatively impact our ability to raise capital or
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting;
the risk that our common stock will be delisted by the NYSE Amex, including as a result of failing
to maintain sufficient stockholders equity or a sufficient stock price; the risk that we are
unable to file timely required reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission; the risk that
we will trigger a maintenance failure under that certain Rights Agreement, dated July 27, 2005,
as amended, and be required to pay liquidated damages, including as a result of losing our
eligibility to use Form S-3 if our common stock is delisted from the NYSE Amex or we are not timely
in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and other risks and uncertainties
discussed in other reports and documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Except as required by law, we do not intend to update these forward-looking statements publicly or
to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
In light of these risks and uncertainties and our assumptions, the forward-looking events and
circumstances discussed in this report and in the documents incorporated in this report may not
occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in
such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not required.
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As a result of recent reductions in our workforce and other departures, we have experienced
substantial turn-over in our personnel responsible for performing activities related to our
internal control over financing reporting, and currently we have only two employees, both of whom
are full-time. In particular, in July 2009, we appointed our general counsel, secretary and vice
president, legal, who has no formal education in finance or accounting, to additionally serve as
our principal financial and principal accounting officer. We have used third-party contractors to ensure our internal control over financial
reporting remains effective during this turn-over. We intend to continue to use these contractors
as long as our working capital permits.
25
Table of Contents
We have revised certain of our internal controls over financial reporting, as well as certain of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as appropriate to reflect our current infrastructure and
staffing. We do not believe these changes have materially and adversely affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially and adversely affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Other than as described above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the
Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In the normal course of business, we may become subject to lawsuits and other claims and
proceedings. Such matters are subject to uncertainty and outcomes are often not predictable with
assurance.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Not required.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On June 12, 2009, in connection with the closing of our registered direct offering of convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock, we issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, as
partial consideration for its services as placement agent, warrants to purchase up to 901,810
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The warrants are exercisable
at the option of the holder at any time beginning on December 13, 2009 through and including June
12, 2014.
On July 6, 2009, in connection with the closing of our registered direct offering of convertible
preferred stock, we issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, as partial consideration for its services as
placement agent, warrants to purchase up to 475,209 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $0.179 per share. The warrants are exercisable at the option of the holder at any time
beginning on January 7, 2010 through and including July 6, 2014.
On August 10, 2009, in connection with the closing of our registered direct offering of convertible
preferred stock, we issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, as partial consideration for its services as
placement agent, warrants to purchase up to 354,615 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $0.1625 per share. The warrants are exercisable at the option of the holder at any time
beginning on February 10, 2010 through and including August 10, 2014.
These warrants were offered and sold by us in reliance upon exemptions from the registration
statement requirements by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions
by an issuer not involving a public offering.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 3, 2009. At this meeting, our
stockholders voted on the following two proposals: (1) election of six nominees to our board of
directors to hold office until our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors
are elected and qualified, and (2) ratification of the appointment of J.H. Cohn LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. On the
record date, 90,252,572 shares of our common stock were entitled to vote. At the meeting,
64,816,947 shares of our common stock were represented in person or by proxy.
Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors
Our stockholders voted to elect all six director nominees to our board of directors. The votes
regarding Proposal No. 1 were as follows:
Nominees: | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||||||
Mark N.K. Bagnall |
59,297,419 | 5,519,528 | ||||||
Alexander J. Denner |
59,354,387 | 5,462,560 | ||||||
Michael M. Goldberg |
59,095,677 | 5,721,270 | ||||||
Jack Lief |
59,121,709 | 5,695,238 | ||||||
Mark J. Pykett |
59,087,293 | 5,729,654 | ||||||
Eric K. Rowinsky |
59,358,787 | 5,458,160 |
27
Table of Contents
Proposal No. 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our stockholders voted to ratify the appointment of J.H. Cohn LLP. The votes regarding Proposal
No. 2 were as follows:
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | ||
62,497,477
|
1,326,491 | 992,977 |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
An Exhibit Index has been attached as part of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.
28
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
||||
Date: August 12, 2009 | By: | /s/ Brian M. Culley | ||
Brian M. Culley | ||||
Chief Business Officer and Senior Vice President (Duly Authorized Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Patrick L. Keran | |||
Patrick L. Keran | ||||
General Counsel, Secretary and Vice President, Legal (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
29
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
3.1(1)
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant | |
3.2(2)
|
Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | |
3.3(3)
|
Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of 5% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock | |
3.4(4)
|
Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of 5% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock | |
4.1(2)
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 8, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto | |
4.2(2)
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on June 12, 2009 by ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to the purchasers of the 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
4.3(3)
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 29, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto | |
4.4(3)
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on July 6, 2009 by ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
4.5(4)
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the purchaser(s) | |
4.6(4)
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on August 10, 2009 by ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
10.1(2)
|
Engagement Letter Agreement, dated June 7, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
10.2(3)
|
Engagement Letter Agreement, dated June 26, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
10.3(4)
|
Engagement Letter Agreement, dated August 4, 2009, by and between ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC | |
31.1
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
31.2
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
32.1 ±
|
Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
± | These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. | |
(1) | Filed with the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K on March 16, 2006 (SEC file number 001-32157-06693266) | |
(2) | Filed with the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K on June 8, 2009 (SEC file number 001-32157-09878961) | |
(3) | Filed with the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K on June 30, 2009 (SEC file number 001-32157-09917820) | |
(4) | Filed with the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K on August 5, 2009 (SEC file number 001-32157-09989205) |
30
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Brian M. Culley, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | ||
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 12, 2009
/s/ Brian M. Culley | ||||
Brian M. Culley | ||||
Chief Business Officer and Senior Vice President (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Patrick L. Keran, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | ||
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 12, 2009
/s/ Patrick L. Keran | ||||
Patrick L. Keran | ||||
General Counsel, Secretary and Vice President, Legal (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian M. Culley, principal executive officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 12, 2009
/s/ Brian M. Culley | ||||
Brian M. Culley | ||||
Chief Business Officer and Senior Vice President (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick L. Keran, principal financial and accounting officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 12, 2009
/s/ Patrick L. Keran | ||||
Patrick L. Keran | ||||
General Counsel, Secretary and Vice President, Legal (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||